Anna Coote is Head of Social Policy at nef.
Britain’s welfare state can’t cope with three great dangers that face us today – deepening social divisions, accelerating climate change and imploding financial systems. William Beveridge said of 1942, when he launched his founding report, that it was a “revolutionary moment in the world’s history, a time for revolutions, not for patching”. The same is true today, but the challenges are new. We need a new social settlement to transform the way we live together and look after each other – a modern welfare system that is fit for the 21st century.
Through 60 years of peace and plenty, Britain has built a welfare state that many see as enviable. But there are still widening inequalities. Unemployment is rocketing. Income inequality is at its highest level since records began. The gap in life expectancy between those living in the poorest areas of England and the average is wider than 10 years ago. The UK ranks a pitiful 13th out of 22 European nations on combined measures of social and personal well-being.
An unequal and divided society can’t take the kind of concerted action that is needed to deal with climate change and the global credit crunch. And these divisions will deepen unless action is taken to prevent the poorest from suffering most from global warming and economic recession.
We argue for radical change our new paper published last week, Green Well Fair: Three economies for social justice. A future welfare system shouldn’t rely on the market economy to keep on growing to fund more and better services. Because growth is not inevitable, and unchecked growth damages the environment. Instead it must value and nurture two other economies that have so far been overlooked. These are the abundant human resources that underpin and shape society, and the fragile resources of the planet, on which all life depends.
It must harness all three economies – people, planet and markets – so that they work together to deliver sustainable social justice. By that we mean the fair and equitable distribution of social, environmental and material resources between people, countries and generations.
Green Well Fair sets out six steps towards sustainable social justice:
- promote well-being for all, putting equality at the heart of social policy
- give priority to preventing harm, to concentrate scarce resources on meeting unavoidable needs
- grow the ‘core’ economy by valuing and nurturing human resources that are currently undervalued
- make carbon work for social justice, so that measures to reduce carbon emissions help to narrow inequalities
- make public services sustainable
- measure success by valuing what matters in social, environmental and economic terms, for the medium and long term.
What could this mean in practice? Here are some examples.
- Two for the price of one: invest in ways of preventing illness and reduce carbon at the same time – such as encouraging active travel and producing fresh, local food. Both will help to combat obesity and climate change.
- Welfare to green work: channel investment in welfare-to-work to boost green industries, to build up skills in home insulation and other ways of cutting carbon emissions, and to support low-carbon living.
- From patient records to people’s plans for well-being: redesign health services around cradle-to-grave health plans for every individual, focused on keeping people well, not just treating them when they are sick.
- Carebanks to pool and grow resources for older people: enable older people to join forces to help themselves and each other, using time as a measure of exchange.
Now, as in 1942, it is no time for patching’. Instead of emerging from the trauma of the war, we face the potential catastrophes of climate change and imploding global capitalism. Such crises provide an unparalleled opportunity to think afresh about social justice and to be ambitious in pursuing it. We can’t afford to miss that chance because all of our lives depend on it.
2 comments
Comments feed for this article
11 February, 2009 at 12:25 pm
Iain Stephenson
Hi
I am new to your blog so haven’t read your paper yet. I agree with your ideas, but struggle to see how we get from where to are to where we need to be. How do you change a system that is focused on individual needs and rights to one that is focussed on community. For example, there is simply no way that the NHS can be sustained while pharmaceuticals charge so much for drugs. In order for the NHS to survive let alone meet the needs for which it was created, the price of drugs must be drastically reduced. How do you change the economic system so that pharmaceuticals don’t produce drugs to make lots and lots of money, but to help others in the community/world life a better life? In order to meet your objectives that is the kind of revolutionary changes that is required.
Perhaps this is addressed in your paper so i will go and read it.
22 February, 2009 at 6:32 am
Daniel Hilson
I was really facinated by your article and I commented on it on my blog :
http://sustainableprogress.blogspot.com/2009/02/social-sustainability-and.html
You have captured so many of the complex threads of sustainability in the context of social progress. My blog comments on this in the perspective of an on-going debate I have with my father who is starting to make me believe that the most complex part of this debate is actually how to get the cultural change to happen. Logically so many of these arguments are robust, however the real complexity may well lie in how we get society to adopt them – no matter how logical and apparently easy to implement they are.
This is due to a confluence of issues – from pesky lobby groups, to greenwash, to perennial issue of making people change. Perhaps this could be integrated as part of your ongoing work – change management?
Anyway – admire what you are doing – and look forward to reading more in future.